Background: The aim of the present systematic literature review is to give an overview of ruptures of the plantar fascia. For this purpose, a detailed description of the patient collective is provided. However, the focus of this analysis is based on the current therapy concepts. Based on the results the authors propose a standardized therapy concept.
Material and methods: A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database using the terms: ("rupture plantar fascia" OR "plantar fascia tear" OR "rupture plantar aponeurosis"). All articles published in the PubMed database until 07.11.2018 were included. The articles were evaluated with regard to three research question: (1) Which patients are affected by a rupture of the plantar fascia? (2) Which therapy concept was used to treat rupture of the plantar fascia? And (3) which result was achieved and how was this measured?
Results: A total of 78 studies were identified, of which the full text of 17 were analysed. 12 publications were cases reports, 5 studies were retrospective analyses. Data from 124 patients could be included. The average age of patients was 39.6 years. In 63.2% (n = 12) of the studies, patients with a high level of athletic activity or even professional athletes were analyzed. 94.4% of all patients were treated conservatively. The average duration of immobilization in a rigid walker was 2.6 weeks. In the majority of cases, pain-adapted weight-bearing was allowed in the rigid walker.
Conclusion: There are few available studies concerning the rupture of plantar fascia. The quality of data is poor. The maximum duration of immobilization of 3 weeks in a rigid walker with pain-adapted weight-bearing appears to be the most applied therapy concept. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the therapy and to optimize the therapy concept.
Keywords: Heel pain; Plantar fascia tear; Review; Rupture plantar fascia; Treatment.
Copyright © 2019 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Mosca M, Fuiano M, Massimi S, Censoni D, Catanese G, Grassi A, Caravelli S, Zaffagnini S. Mosca M, et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2022 Jun;15(3):272-282. doi: 10.1177/1938640020974889. Epub 2020 Dec 14. Foot Ankle Spec. 2022. PMID: 33307799
Acevedo JI, Beskin JL. Acevedo JI, et al. Foot Ankle Int. 1998 Feb;19(2):91-7. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900207. Foot Ankle Int. 1998. PMID: 9498581
Kim C, Cashdollar MR, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Fuge L. Kim C, et al. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010 Dec;3(6):335-7. doi: 10.1177/1938640010378530. Epub 2010 Sep 3. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010. PMID: 20817847
Christel P, Rigal S, Poux D, Roger B, Witvoët J. Christel P, et al. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1993;79(3):218-25. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1993. PMID: 8122010 Review. French.
La Porta GA, La Fata PC. La Porta GA, et al. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2005 Jan;22(1):1-9, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2004.08.001. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2005. PMID: 15555839 Review.
Costa D, Cruz P, Brito R, Cantista P, Rodrigues-Gomes S. Costa D, et al. Cureus. 2023 May 4;15(5):e38527. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38527. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37273344 Free PMC article.
De Castro Correia M, Rodrigues Lopes T. De Castro Correia M, et al. Cureus. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):e32987. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32987. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36712717 Free PMC article.
Liu Z, Sui X, Hui R, Zhao Y, Li H, Huang X. Liu Z, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30613. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030613. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022. PMID: 36197189 Free PMC article.
Chin CM, Tang HM, Yang KC, Chen IH, Wang CC. Chin CM, et al. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 10;58(8):1075. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081075. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36013542 Free PMC article.
Kim YH, Chai JW, Kim DH, Kim HJ, Seo J. Kim YH, et al. Ultrasonography. 2022 Jan;41(1):34-52. doi: 10.14366/usg.21069. Epub 2021 Jun 29. Ultrasonography. 2022. PMID: 34674456 Free PMC article.